logo

30 pages 1 hour read

Richard Nixon

Checkers

Nonfiction | Essay / Speech | Adult | Published in 1952

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Literary Devices

Repetition

Nixon uses repetition in a variety of patterns, including the use of repetitive words, ideas, and/or phrases. Though he uses slight variations in wording, the alignment of ideas remains such, as seen in Nixon’s most common phrase, “let me say.” He slightly alters the phrasing by saying “let me point out” (Paragraph 6) and “let me tell you” (Paragraph 7) but maintains the same effect. These phrases, repeated throughout the speech, portray Nixon as at the mercy of the audience. Even though the televised audience has no true authority in “let[ting]” Nixon do anything, this repeated act of asking permission reduces any authoritarian entitlement and, instead, supports the humble every-man persona that Nixon strives to depict.

In contrast to his repetition of the phrase “I say,” as he uses it in Paragraph 4 and again in Paragraph 35, “let me say” is a much more passive introduction to the information he means to present. When using the phrase “I say,” he is much more declarative and passionate. He also seems to imply that what follows that phrase has no room for permission or humility. Instead, when he repeats this declaration, he first does so to share the non-negotiable immorality of the actions he is accused of committing (Paragraph 4). Then, he uses the same repetitive phrasing to discuss his fight against corruption and the lack of action by his opponents (Paragraph 35). It seems, for these statements, that there is no question of whether he should be granted the space to explain; for these statements, they must be declared boldly and with or without permission.

Anaphora

Nixon also uses anaphora, a type of repetition focusing on the first part of successive clauses or sentences to emphasize major points across the speech. In Paragraph 4, he expands the repetitive phrase “I say” to also include “it was morally wrong.” He repeats the phrase for three consecutive lines to stress his point that all the accusations brought against him are indeed actions considered to be morally wrong. He uses this specific form of repetition to frontload his statement in a way that cannot be denied.

Nixon does this again when explaining what the fund in question is meant to pay for. He allows his audience to come to same undeniable conclusion he has by beginning each line with “Do you think” (Paragraph 8). He lists expenses that shouldn’t be covered by taxes and accentuates the audience’s freedom to think otherwise: “Do you think, when a senator makes political broadcasts or political television broadcasts, radio or television, that the expense of those broadcasts should be charged to the taxpayer?” (Paragraph 8). This invites his audience to answer what he has already surmised will be a firm no.

He uses this style of repetition once more in the phrase “I’m proud of the fact” (Paragraph 13). In this paragraph, he lists the accusations against him and shares his pride over the fact that not one is true. Again, he uses this form of repetition to create an indisputable tone and emphasize the confidence in his statements to the point of unquestionability. 

Epistrophe

Another form of repetition Nixon employs in his speech is that of epistrophe; like anaphora, he reiterates his points through the repetition of phrases in successive clauses or sentences. In this style, however, the phrases are found toward the end of the sentence—allowing for a strong or lingering finish to his statements. For example, in Paragraph 8, he opens with the question, “Do you think, for example, when I or any other Senator makes a trip to his home state to make a purely political speech that the cost of that trip should be charged to the taxpayers?” He repeats the same structure in the next line, ending with the same phrase of “should be charged to the taxpayer?” (Paragraph 8). In his aim to emphasize the incredulity of expecting taxpayers to cover political expenses, he is sure to repeat and end with that sentiment. The effect is that if the audience were to hear none of his question except the last statement, they would find interest in the topic since it may pertain to their own finances and contributions.

Hypophora

Nixon effectively incorporates hypophora throughout his speech as he poses questions to his audience and then follows with an answer of his own. He does this most impactfully when he anticipates the questions and any follow-up concerns that may arise. For example, when disputing the accusations against him, Nixon offers, “Well, then, some of you will say, and rightly, ‘Well, what did you use the fund for, senator?’ ‘Why did you have to have it?’” (Paragraph 7). He presents the expected doubt that corrupted administration had led to among the American people, and then he puts these doubts at ease.

He does this again when he says, “[S]ome of you may say, ‘Well, that’s all right, Senator, that’s your explanation, but have you got any proof?’” (Paragraph 14), and again when he states, “[T]here are some that will say, ‘Well, maybe you were able, Senator, to fake this thing. How can we believe what you say?’” (Paragraph 16). By using this technique, Nixon anticipates and defuses the skepticism that his audience may feel toward his claims. He then transitions toward assurance that he will continue to prove himself to be honest and true in the face of any doubts or questions.

Apophasis

Nixon makes frequent use of apophasis—a rhetorical device in which the speaker calls attention to a subject by declaring that they are not going to talk about it. For example, after explaining why he thought it would be wrong to add his wife, Pat, to his Senate payroll as a secretary, he notes that his opponent, John Sparkman, has done just that. He then says, “Now let me just say this: That is his business, and I am not critical of him for doing that. You will have to pass judgment on that particular point” (Paragraph 32). In this way, Nixon avoids the appearance that he is attempting to smear Sparkman. He emphasizes that he is not judging Sparkman while encouraging his audience to do so. Similarly, he notes that presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson II has some questionable campaign funds of his own, saying, “I don’t condemn Mr. Stevenson for what he did, but until all the facts are in there is a doubt that would be raised” (Paragraph 31). Again, through apophasis, Nixon emphasizes that he himself is not raising this doubt; instead, he is merely noting that a doubt might exist and that Stevenson should therefore explain himself.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text