logo

43 pages 1 hour read

Agatha Christie

Murder on the Orient Express

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1934

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Justice Versus Retribution

The book’s most significant theme is that of justice versus retribution. By the end of the book, the reader will have to ask themselves whether the need for justice outweighs the need for retribution. Poirot will be forced to address the question more concretely when he must choose between the two theories of the murder he’s developed—a correct theory that prioritizes justice (by imprisoning 12 murderers) versus an incorrect theory that prioritizes retribution (by letting those same 12 murderers walk free, all in the name of justice).

Colonel Arbuthnot first broaches the concept of retribution. When he “learns” Mr. Ratchett’s true identity is Cassetti, he says, “The swine deserved what he got. Though I would have preferred to have seen him properly hanged—or electrocuted, I suppose, over there” (133). Poirot makes note of the Colonel’s preference for retribution, in that the man’s response illustrates his own ideas of how justice could have been delivered.

As the narrative continues, it becomes clear that “justice” failed Daisy Armstrong, a little girl who Mr. Ratchett (Cassetti) kidnapped and murdered. The man who was slain in the train’s compartment becomes less a victim as his crimes are revealed and the continued losses included the girl’s mother, unborn sibling, father, and nursemaid. Mr. Ratchett (Cassetti) stood trial for the murder but was acquitted due to his connections and wealth. The innocent was taken along with her family and the guilty was left to roam Europe, change his name, and enjoy his remaining life freely.

The characters aboard the train uphold the theme of justice versus retribution in their reactions to Poirot’s presentation that Mr. Ratchett was Cassetti. Each suspect produces a response of surprise or relief at retribution enacted, but no individual mourns the deceased Cassetti. Due to his unacceptable crimes, the murdered in this investigation is peripheral to the investigation itself and how Poirot will reveal the responsible parties.

Poirot’s investigation reveals that the criminal justice system failed to deliver. Cassetti was guilty and his actions resulted in multiple deaths. Retribution becomes the true justice for Poirot and the others aboard the train who decide to deliver what a courtroom couldn’t. Cassetti is murdered and the train, Poirot, Bouc, and Dr. Constantine included, decide that there have been no injustices to right.

The Psychology of Investigation

In Murder on the Orient Express, Poirot’s primary work is psychological. Poirot highlights the psychological aspect of his role on more than one occasion. He consistently notes how the suspects appear to him, and then ruminates on the psychology behind their motives. At first, most of the passengers seem to have air-tight alibis provided by other passengers who had no surface-level reason to vouch for their whereabouts. When reflecting on his interrogation of MacQueen, Poirot is convinced that the secretary could not have been involved with the murder. However, Poirot remains suspicious of Mary Debenham and Colonel Arbuthnot because they’re unwilling to reveal the topic of a hushed conversation Poirot overheard. This suspicion, though confounding to Bouc and Dr. Constantine, is rooted in the psychology of the investigation for Poirot: He understands that Debenham and Arbuthnot are willing to hide a conversation, so what else are they willing to conceal?

The crime’s methods themselves also reveal the psychology of the victim’s murderer. Poirot disagrees with Bouc’s assertion that the crime was one of passion. He recognizes the crime to be methodical and planned, with planted clues such as the handkerchief and pipe cleaner. Through observation of the scene, Poirot is able to detect which clues were not planted, such as the match that was used to burn a letter to Mr. Ratchett (Cassetti) revealing the ties to the Daisy Armstrong kidnapping case.

Through logical deduction and crucial attention to detail, Poirot is able to unravel the ties that bind the 12 passengers together. Bouc’s comment about the “romantic” melting pot of the train’s many nationalities represented in its passengers begins a line of thought early in the novel. Poirot is able to separate his impressions of the passengers, such as his thoughts that MacQueen and the Colonel could not be involved with the stabbing and his attention to the subtle psychological slips by key passengers. For example, Mary Debenham, a reported Englishwoman who never visited America uses the American term of “long-distance” for calls, while Hildegarde Schmidt admits that all her ladies admitted she was a good cook—an unknown admission that she was not a true lady’s maid, since lady’s maids don’t cook.

Dr. Constantine’s examination of the victim’s body confirms what Poirot learns from monitoring the passengers’ actions and slips of phrase: The crime was committed by many people, as seen in the varied stab wounds that seem to disconnect with one another. As 12 people were stabbing Mr. Ratchett (Cassetti), no one wound is like the other, reflecting the individuals who made them and the psychological factors behind their actions. 

Xenophobic Discrimination

Xenophobic discrimination is present throughout the book, from start to finish, and contributes to Poirot’s solving the case. In the book’s post-WWI context, having such a mix of nationalities together as seen on the Orient Express was seen as highly unusual in Europe. Bouc even remarks on it early on: “It lends itself to romance, my friend. All around us are people, of all classes, of all nationalities, of all ages, are brought together. They sleep and eat under one roof, they cannot get away from each other” (24).

Throughout the book, many of the characters express animosity toward people of other nationalities. Colonel Arbuthnot and Mary Debenham are characterized as cold and uninviting to anyone who isn’t English like they are. Meanwhile, Bouc suspects “the Italian” precisely because of his nationality, stereotyping him thusly: “Italians use the knife! And they are great liars! I do not like Italians” (148). The Italian himself is not immune to nation-based discrimination, disparaging his compartment-mate, the English Masterman, as “the miserable John Bull” (147). The Swedish nurse, Greta Ohlsson is consistently described as timid and compared to a sheep.

The clashing of nationalities adds fresh perspective to the locked-room nature of the murder mystery: All these European nations are stuck on a train, in the snow, together. As the book progresses, the narrator shows the individuals overcoming their discriminatory attitudes and mingling more freely. Of course, by the book’s end, the reader will learn that the train passengers all know one another and aren’t the strangers they first seem. The melting pot of nationalities that first strikes Poirot as so strange proves to be the kind of oddity that turns out to be a pivotal clue to solving the mystery.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text