logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Drew Gilpin Faust

Necessary Trouble: Growing Up at Midcentury

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 4-5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 4 Summary: “Many Feelings About Segregation”

Faust grew up on a farm near the Blue Ridge Mountains, a mile and a half from Millwood, Virginia, population 200, most of whom were Black and lived in homes without running water. The white families of Faust’s childhood friends lived on other surrounding farms. All of the Black people that Faust knew worked for white people as laborers or domestics. Jim Crow laws (See: Index of Terms) governed Virginia, but unlike the Deep South, there weren’t “colored” signs in public places; “people just knew […] or learned” (88) to abide by the rules of segregation.

As a child, Faust took segregation for granted. Even in her own home, their Black workers used the back door and a separate bathroom, and it never occurred to her to question the practice. Virginia was a state full of “contradictions,” home to “the architects of American freedom and nationhood” (89) but also the birthplace of American enslavement and the capital of the Confederacy. Faust never saw racially-motivated violence; instead, white people often behaved with “benevolent paternalistic concern” which “had endeavored to cloak the injustices of southern race relations for generations” (92). Her father usually adopted this tone with his Black employees, but coming from New England, Faust’s mother was always uncomfortable around Black people.

The “patterns of racial separation and white supremacy” were not the only “manifestations of the past” (98) in Faust’s childhood. She also grew up with Confederate monuments and memorials and reenacted famous battles with her brothers. The siblings fought over who got to be General Robert E. Lee, and for years, Faust had no idea he had lost the war. Lee was regarded as a hero in an idealized portrayal of the past that “obscured and all but erased” the Civil War’s “emancipationist purposes” (100). This point of view represented a larger romanticization of the old South, depicting enslavement as “not a system of cruelty and exploitation that stole millions of Black lives,” but rather a system of “gracious plantations peopled with benevolent masters and docile, devoted, and grateful slaves” (100). The white adults that Faust grew up with were convinced “that Black people both accepted and deserved their assigned, separate, and subordinated place” (100-1).

However, fighting the Nazis in World War II made it more difficult to ignore racial inequalities in the United States. Black Americans fighting in the war advocated for a “Double V” victory—victory in the war abroad, and victory in the fight against discrimination at home. The start of the civil rights movement with the 1955 Montgomery bus boycott was “the almost immediate outcome of the war” (102).

In 1957, Faust’s grandmother installed a plaque commemorating the enslaved people buried in her family’s cemetery. In some cemeteries, demand for space caused white graves to spill into the space where enslaved people were buried, resulting in the erasure of these graves. Perhaps the plaque was a well-intentioned effort to prevent the dead from being forgotten, but the timing of the plaque’s erection in 1957 perplexes Faust, and its wording seemed to reaffirm hierarchies of race. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled on Brown v. Board of Education, ordering public schools to integrate. This order was met with much resistance and even violence. In Virginia, the governor’s election had become “a referendum on race” to defend “the morality and legitimacy” of racial discrimination (104-5). Within this context, Faust argues that her grandmother’s plaque, which calls enslaved people “faithful and devoted […] servants” (103), represented an effort “to reassure a society under siege that it was not just right but righteous” (105).

In elementary school, Faust was shocked to learn it was against the law for Black children and white children to go to school together. Upset and angered, Faust decided to write a letter to the president. She began by announcing she was nine years old, white, and had “many feelings about segregation” (109). Faust argued that segregation was “unchristian” and “unfair,” urging the president to “please try and have schools and other things accept colored people” (112). As a girl growing up in a patriarchal society, Faust was obsessed with fairness and angry about the injustices she faced as a girl. She wonders if her “finely honed sense of personal injustice [translated] into an empathy for injustices done to others” (112).

Faust’s “epiphany” opened her eyes to the “silence and denial […] obscuring the realities of [her] world” (113). She refused to quietly accept the many contradictions she began to see around her. She quotes civil rights leader and Congressman John Lewis, who spoke of “necessary trouble”: Faust feels that her rebellious nature was a kind of necessary trouble that allowed her “to survive amid the stifling silences that threatened to define [her] life” (113).

Chapter 5 Summary: “Life in the Fifties”

Growing up, Faust read Life magazine along with an estimated half of Americans in the 1950s. Looking back at Life as an adult, Faust describes the magazine’s portrayal of the 1950s as “so familiar and so strange” (115). She recognizes, for example, the products being advertised but is still surprised to see full-page cigarette ads and suggestions for customers to give their babies 7-Up.

Faust describes Life’s coverage of women as “scarce” and portraying “an unease about who American women were becoming” (117). Various articles chronicled the growing discontent of 1950s housewives, a perspective that Faust calls progressive but which drew complaints from some readers. As the civil rights movement gained steam, Life showed both sides of the debate. Although they gave “respectful attention” to segregationists, the magazine illustrated “a clear commitment to Black progress and equality” (120). It began to publish “dramatic and disturbing” content that “eschewed any romanticized or sanitized version of America’s racial history” (122). Life published stories of the Black boys and girls at the center of the civil rights movement, and Faust empathized with these children’s struggles. She also found inspiration in other youth movements, like the Hungarian Revolution that began as a student protest in 1956.

In the Cold War era of fighting for “the future of global freedom” (125), Faust saw the world in terms of good and evil. She worried about the possibility of nuclear war and listened to adults around her discussing the pros and cons of fallout shelters. When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik in 1957, the United States was again fearful. Faust worried that “America’s vaunted invincibility” was, like the contradictions she was beginning to understand about race, “yet another set of untruths adults had imposed on [her]” (128). Although she understood little of the larger context, she and many others of her generation began to experience doubt and worry. They started “to see through the comforting illusions at the heart of postwar American culture” and “ask the questions that […] would transform American society” (131).

As the children of Faust’s generation began to grow and mature, they discovered that the hypocrisy of their parents’ generation extended to their developing sexuality. Faust’s mother ignored her daughter’s changing body for as long as possible and refused to discuss sex outside of vague generalizations. However, the new rhythms of rock and roll music helped Faust “toward recognition and expression of sexual feelings and longings” (132) that were silenced in the white middle class. New dance styles upended traditional leader and follower roles and allowed women a new level of independence. Much of the popular music of the day has been “criticized as […] expropriation of Black artists and traditions,” but from Faust’s young point of view, it “offered […] liberation from the constraints at the heart of white 1950s culture” (133).

As the 1950s ended, Faust describes herself as “suffused with skepticism and even dismay about the path [her] life was expected to take” (135). She rebelled against her mother’s increasingly strict rules, motivated by what she saw as “the dishonesty and denial at the core of [her] parents’ existence” (136).

Chapters 4-5 Analysis

Chapters 4 and 5 delve into Faust’s developing self-awareness and early encounters with unfairness and injustice. She describes how postwar American culture was built of a series of “comforting illusions” that obscured unsavory aspects of reality, like continued racism and sexism.

Chapter 4 focuses on the racial inequality surrounding Faust in 1950s Virginia, adding a new dimension to The Intersection of Class, Race, Gender, and Privilege. Segregation and racial discrimination were so normalized that Faust took them for granted throughout her childhood, never thinking to question their legitimacy until she learned about school desegregation at nine years old. White society had built a “veneer of timeless inevitability” (107) that prevented individuals from questioning the legitimacy of white supremacy. A critical strategy in constructing this veneer was romanticizing the Old South and the Civil War. Instead of remembering enslavement as “a system of cruelty and exploitation,” white southerners created an idealized version of antebellum society filled with “docile, devoted, and grateful slaves” (100). With a “combination of silence and denial […] obscuring [reality]” (113), these systems of oppression become easy to perpetuate.

Faust describes reenacting Civil War battles with her brothers “unaware […] [they] were in some fundamental way affirming the racial order in which [they] lived” (100). Likewise, the plaque Faust’s grandmother erected in the cemetery was another unwitting perpetuation of “the assumptions of white dominance and Black subservience” (106). Since these systems of oppression were not acknowledged or spoken about openly, they became difficult to recognize and even more difficult to dismantle. As her family excelled in keeping up appearances and “performing” their socially-prescribed roles, race was another topic they were adept at hiding.

Until Faust was nine, the contradictions “between the democratic and Christian ideals intoned in church and school and the patterns of injustice” (106) in society were invisible to her. Her sudden epiphany introduces the theme of The Impact of Historical Events on Personal Development. Faust explains how World War II “accelerated the pace of change in many dimensions of American society” (101), including race. She describes the Montgomery bus boycott as “the almost immediate outcome of the war” (102) that challenged segregation. These events deeply affected Faust as a young child and set her on a lifelong path to “[penetrate] the blindness and the taken-for-grantedness of the present” (113)

The Cold War is another historical event that had an important effect on Faust’s personal development. When the Soviet Union succeeded in launching the first artificial satellite, beating the United States in the space race, the assumptions of American exceptionalism that Faust grew up believing were challenged. The United States “was not all-powerful” (129) like she had been led to believe. Rather, its “vaunted invincibility” appeared to be “yet another set of untruths adults had imposed on [her]” (128). Events like the Cold War and the growing civil rights movement began to sow doubt in her generation, creating cracks in the illusionary post-war peace and happiness. Children who grew up in the 1950s began to recognize the hypocrisy and denial in their society and began to search for alternative ways of living, ushering in the decade of social change that constituted the 1960s.

These chapters also include a brief discussion of the origin and significance of the book’s title. Faust describes civil rights leader and Congressman John Lewis’ call for “necessary trouble” in describing the need to act in ways that are outside of the realm of acceptable behavior to bring about meaningful change. Faust sees her own “childhood rebellion” as a kind of “necessary trouble.” She argues that it was necessary to behave in ways her father sometimes called “impossible” in order “to survive amid the stifling silences that threatened to define [her] life” (113).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text