52 pages • 1 hour read
C. S. LewisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section includes descriptions of racist attitudes and biases put forth by the author.
Ancient Greece and ancient Rome both had a profound and lasting impact on the people and literature of the Medieval Era, for no other sources were held in such high esteem as classical ones. Plato and Aristotle were particularly strong influences, but many other classical writers and thinkers also left their mark on the Medieval Model of the universe. Medieval people’s understanding of the cosmos, for instance, came largely from Ptolemy’s geocentric universe. Other classical writers provided the inspiration for the heavenly spheres and for Earth’s cosmic insignificance. Although most people in medieval Europe were Christian, with Christianity being an official religion in many countries, medieval people did inherit some aspects of ancient Greek and Roman polytheistic religions. For example, the planets were named after Roman deities, and many medieval people believed in astrology. Additionally, classical figures appeared often in medieval texts.
Another significant kind of classical thought in the Medieval Model can be found in medieval people’s perceived cultural heritage. C. S. Lewis notes that many people in medieval Britain considered themselves to be literally, metaphorically, or (at the very least) intellectually descended from the Trojans. This belief can be traced back to the ancient Roman poet, Virgil, whose epic poem, the Aeneid, explicitly linked ancient Greece with ancient Rome. As eventual members of the Roman Empire, medieval Britons considered themselves to be part of this long (though entirely fictitious) line of descent. However, this conviction proved to be far from a harmless falsehood, for the belief that medieval people were in any sense the rightful heirs to the greatness of the Roman Empire was used to justify imperialism and later fueled notions of cultural and racial superiority. C. S. Lewis is well aware that medieval people were not descended from the Trojans, but he nevertheless continues this line of reasoning uncritically. In fact, he is particularly adamant in the book’s first chapter that medieval Europeans assimilated flawlessly into Roman culture, unlike the so-called “savage” colonized peoples of later centuries.
Lewis notes only one major exception to his argument that classical ideas essentially built the Medieval Model: fairies. Fairy stories were prevalent in medieval literature, but they came directly from Britain and other European cultures without much intercession at all from either classical or Christian sources. Lewis finds the presence of fairies in literature to be frustrating because they are difficult to categorize according to the Model as he has described it; they destabilize the entire system, which is otherwise very carefully ordered. Eventually, fairies, like classical influences, were adapted, mediated, and in many cases Christianized in medieval literature. Thus, it is clear that medieval people were not simply repeating verbatim what they learned from Greek and Roman sources, but were instead using these influences to develop their own composite culture.
The Medieval Model of the universe was highly ordered, with everything in its correct place. Its seeming perfection rendered it a widely accepted explanation of the universe, which is part of why Lewis believes it was so widely accepted for such a long time. Succinctly put, the medieval universe left little room for uncertainty. It reflected God’s perfect creation to such an extent that the entire universe, planets included, was thought to be continuously rejoicing in God’s presence and love. Human beings, living in the chaotic sublunary realm instead of in the perfect translunary realm, were thought to be on the periphery of this creation. Despite this relative cosmic exile, Lewis believes that medieval people still found the predictability of this specific understanding of the universe to be comforting rather than isolating. To medieval people, the Model was so pleasing and so universal that it even deserved to be incorporated into architecture, an honor that has not been accorded to any widespread scientific understanding of the universe today.
The Model was not only useful for understanding the stars and the rotation of the planets, for its order and hierarchy helped people to categorize the elements, life on Earth, the soul, and personal temperaments. The principle of the Triad, or the idea that everything ought to come in threes, helped people to fit any unknown quantities into the Model. The Triad was the basis for people’s understandings of life in the translunary, aetherial, and earthbound realms. This idea was also central to the hierarchy of angel species that were folded into Christian thought via Pseudo-Dionysius. The human soul was understood to have three aspects: Rational, Sensitive, and Vegetable. All of these triads reflected the Christian trinity. Although Lewis does not say so, the heavy emphasis on order and hierarchy also made medieval society socially rigid. Any resistance to established norms transcended mere social upheaval and was interpreted to be an affront to the natural order of things as laid out by God. The Model therefore functioned as a tool for social control, not just as a means of understanding the universe.
To many people in the Medieval Era, the Model looked like a perfect, impenetrable description of the entire universe: one that left no room for doubt. However, the Model only appeared to be flawless after it had become fully established. It was not a single plan of the universe handed down directly from God; instead, it was a hodge-podge of classical sources with a Christian veneer, representing medieval people’s best attempt at understanding their place in the cosmos. Many elements of the Model were not Christian, which was why most spiritual writers did not engage with it in their work. The apparently perfect rotation of the spheres still had to include clumsy epicycles to account for astronomical inconsistencies, and the whole model was thrown into doubt by prevalent stories of fairies. As Lewis readily acknowledges, the Medieval Model did not depict the truth of the universe, and it eventually gave way to newer models.
To modern eyes, the medieval relationship to literature appears rather credulous, for the people of the time considered books to be almost universally trustworthy, particularly if they came from classical civilizations. Many people were willing to take almost any literary information at face value, even if that information was fictitious or obviously false. It is uncertain whether medieval people knew that their history books contained fictional stories, but regardless, they did not appear to care. C. S. Lewis presents two contradictory arguments to explain this strange relationship, and he never comes to a clear conclusion about which of the two arguments he believes to be true. The first argument is that people did not know or care about the distinction between fact and fiction. In their history books, they valued useful information, entertainment, and the glorification of great deeds; truth was not a consideration. In a prominent example of this view, Lewis says that people spoke of Dante as a man who had visited Hell, not as a man who had written an epic poem about visiting Hell.
The second argument that Lewis puts forward is that medieval people did understand the difference between fact and fiction, and that they did not repeat falsehoods because they literally believed them to be true, but because those falsehoods were a convenient way to tell moralistic tales. From this perspective, such falsehoods offered medieval people a common pool of metaphors to facilitate discussion, and they were simply part of the polite, conventional understanding of the world that had more to do with familiarity than with fact. For example, people knew that horses did not cry when their owners died; they merely employed this image as people today might use colorful but nonsensical metaphors about animals. (For example, modern literature has used the image of an ostrich burying its head in the sand without asserting this behavior to be literally true.) However although modern people might speak casually about such metaphors, it is not common to write them all out in books alongside factual information.
It is very likely that the truth of the medieval relationship to literature was somewhere in the middle of these two arguments. The Medieval Era lasted for a very long time, and no group or culture is monolithic. As Lewis notes early in The Discarded Image, the Model that he presents is a normative idea used primarily by poets, not a universal dogma that everyone understood in the same way. Some people were likely largely (or entirely) unaware of the precepts of the Model, while others accepted most of it but had their own personal views. Finally, still others, especially spiritual writers and religious leaders, found it largely objectionable. The Medieval Era ended long ago, and despite the best efforts of writers like Lewis, it is not possible to fully answer these lingering questions.
By C. S. Lewis
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Art
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Books & Literature
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Medieval Literature / Middle Ages
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection