logo

43 pages 1 hour read

Ludwig Feuerbach

The Essence of Christianity

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1841

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1, Chapters 7-12Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1: “The True or Anthropological Essence of Religion”

Part 1, Chapter 7 Summary: “The Mystery of the Logos and Divine Image”

Christians are primarily interested in the Son of God, the second person of the Trinity, Jesus Christ. He is the mediator between humans and God, and most importantly he is an image: “the representation of God, the visible glory of the invisible God” (55-56). Rather than worship an invisible, abstract God, humans worship an image of God—something that can be seen, touched, and imagined.

The presence of the image of the divine word—the Logos, in Greek—allows for human beings to externalize their thoughts in feelings through worship; the Catholic Church insists that even images of holy things are themselves holy. The truth lies in the fact that words have great power: the power to influence, command, rule, teach, guide, and create. Feuerbach concludes, “Men pass away, the word remains; the word is life and truth. All power is given to the word” (57).

Part 1, Chapter 8 Summary: “The Mystery of the Cosmogonical Principle in God”

The Son is the principle by which the world comes into being. The Son, as the second person of the trinity, is begotten by the Father. The Son therefore contains the finite within his nature, and makes creation possible: “The world is not God; it is other than God, the opposite of God, or at least that which is different from God. But that which is different from God cannot have come immediately from God” (59). According to this understanding, God must contain a distinction within himself, and this is what we call the Son.

The relationship between God the Father and God the Son parallels how a human relates to the world. Just as God comes to the world through the intermediary of the Son, so do human beings come to the world through other human beings. In this sense, then, other human beings are to us what the Son is to God; thus, the Son is really other human beings: “The ego, then, attains to consciousness of the world through consciousness of the thou. Thus man is the God of man” (60). Difference within God provides the means for creation, and the distinction within human beings that gives rise to self-consciousness allows for a connection, through others, to the natural world.

Part 1, Chapter 9 Summary: “The Mystery of Mysticism, or of Nature in God”

Feuerbach turns to the Christian experience of mysticism, arguing that when mystics enter darkness they enter God himself: “If the light in God springs out of the darkness in God, this is only because it is involved in the idea of light in general, that it illuminates darkness, thus presupposing darkness, not making it” (62-63). Mysticism is further evidence that God contains a material aspect, for the immaterial is what is clear and intelligible, while the material is dense, obscure, and dark.

Within religion, mysticism represents an attempt to discern and enter into what is called God’s nature: “The doctrine of Nature in God aims, by naturalism, to establish theism, especially the theism which regards the Supreme Being as a personal being” (68). Religion allows human beings to free themselves from their material limitations; the mystics’ attempt to enter into the self-consciousness of God is a quest to satisfy this desire to be absolutely free. Mysticism shows that religion allows for total subjectivity in the human’s search for the personal subject of God—in the end, however, this is a quest for one’s own personality, since the experience of God is the experience of the self.

Part 1, Chapter 10 Summary: “The Mystery of Providence, and Creation out of Nothing”

Since creation is an act of will, divine revelation of creation affirms the divine nature of the will. Attached to this are the realities of omnipotence, providence, and creatio ex nihilo, or the power to bring something out of nothing. The paradox of omnipotent providence, however, is that it is the manifestation of pure subjectivity in the will: “Providence cancels the laws of Nature; it interrupts the course of necessity, the iron bond which inevitably binds effects to causes; in short, it is the same unlimited, all-powerful will, that called the world into existence out of nothing” (71). The will allows for all things to be, to change, and to come into and out of existence.

Since the Incarnation makes the divine will human, the human will must be wholly provident. God’s will is concerned with bringing humanity into existence, God’s love is concerned with the love of humanity, and the purpose of creation is to create human beings. Human consciousness is the ultimate goal of creation, and with the rise of consciousness, the concept of God becomes possible—in this sense, it is only with the rise of human beings that God is possible, for human beings are the only beings capable of thinking of God and introducing their own personality into the act of contemplating the divine nature.

Part 1, Chapter 11 Summary: “The Significance of the Creation in Judaism”

The realities of nature impress themselves upon the human intellect from the very first moment of perception, which raises the question of the source of nature. The act of creation as the source of nature belongs in a special way to Judaism. In many ways Judaism is unique among the ancient philosophies and religions, especially in its view of the uniqueness of Israel and their own people: “Their principle, their God, is the most practical principle in the world,—namely, egoism; and moreover egoism in the form of religion” (78). In this, they made way for the advancement of religion and humanity.

By positing a creation, they also posited an omnipotent and transcendent creator. In doing so, they lifted humanity up from “idolatry” (worship of the creature) to “true” worship (worship of the creator). In Judaism, the world’s first truly monotheistic religion, all is sacrificed for the one God and his desire. Because God is a projection of human nature, self-consciousness is the power that must rule all and be subject to no other.

Part 1, Chapter 12 Summary: “The Omnipotence of Feeling, or the Mystery of Prayer”

In ancient Israel, God was the collective idea of the national consciousness: “Jehovah himself was nothing else than the self-consciousness of Israel made objective as the absolute being, the national conscience, the universal law, the central point of the political system” (81). As religion evolved, God expanded to include all of humanity rather than just a single nation. God finally became the embodiment of universal love instead of preferential love.

When a person turns to the religious act of prayer, they are turning to humanity’s love for itself: “Prayer is the self-division of man into two beings,—a dialogue of man with himself, with his heart” (83). Prayer is the recognition of human omnipotence in matters of the heart, and the recognition that the human will cannot be overtaken or controlled by any outside force. Human feeling is sovereign over all things.

Part 1, Chapters 7-12 Analysis

Two important themes stand out in these chapters that are dealt with explicitly here and not elsewhere. The first is the concept of the human person as created in the image and likeness of God. This particular claim is made by Feuerbach in his argument that Christians are primarily interested in the second person of the Trinity, the Son, or the Logos (i.e., the word of God). While this claim would find objectors from a Christian perspective—especially a Catholic perspective—Feuerbach’s criticism is concentrated on the Christian focus on Jesus as the Son of God who is in fact the image of the Father.

As the image of God, the Son embodies God in the world and acts as the mediator between God and humanity. In Feuerbach’s view, this helps to prove that theology is in fact simply anthropology. The Critique of Theology as Anthropology is not unique to Feuerbach, but he pushes the boundaries in ways that many other thinkers were uncomfortable with. He argues that the Christian adoration and worship of the Son is actually the adoration and worship of Human Nature. The idea that the Son could be the image of the Father is a theological way of speaking to the reality of humans being images of human nature, embodying what is best and most divine about humanity within their unique existences.

The Christian tendency of speaking about Christ as the image of the Father, which finds its roots in the New Testament’s Gospel of John and in the Letter to the Hebrews, highlights the true reality—according to Feuerbach—that Christ is the truest instance of human nature. Jesus can be looked upon and worshipped as the paradigm of perfect humanity; theology uses the term Son of God, where the real science (i.e., anthropology) would do well to speak of the Son of Man. In Feuerbach’s vision, holding up Christ as the perfect image and archetype allows the imagination to spur the mind on to greater heights; as he points out, words are just abstract notions, but an image is concrete, and therefore much easier for the human soul to grasp.

The second important theme these chapters address is the reality underlying religious prayer. In Feuerbach’s view, the act of prayer is the means by which human beings come to understand their own omnipotence, their own power over their words and actions and feelings. Whereas theology sees prayer as something that entreats the divine will to move in a particular way, Feuerbach sees it as a psychological exercise in recognizing one’s own power.

Interestingly, there is an analogous reality within the Christian tradition itself. The Christian theological tradition has a long history of interpreting the act of prayer not as something designed to change God’s mind—as if God were waiting on human action in order to decide how to run the universe—but as an activity in which the person allows their own heart to be changed by the divine will. In other words, Christians view prayer as an act by which they participate in God’s providence over the world by submitting to God’s will and allowing their hearts to be changed and moved to compassion and love. In the end, however, Christian theology would still view prayer as an act of supreme humility and dependence on God as the source of all good things, while Feuerbach would resist this characterization. For Feuerbach, prayer is the opposite of dependence; it may superficially resemble such an attitude, but in reality it is a movement of the mind and feelings that necessarily results in the human soul’s recognition of its own power over itself.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text