logo

50 pages 1 hour read

James M. Mcpherson

The War That Forged a Nation: Why the Civil War Still Matters

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2015

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Key Figures

James McPherson (The Author)

James McPherson (born in 1936) is an American historian who holds the position of the George Henry Davis 1886 Professor of American History Emeritus at Princeton University. He is also a Pulitzer Prize-winning author who specializes in the Civil War. He earned his bachelor of arts and PhD at Gustavus Adolphus College and Johns Hopkins University, respectively. In the opening chapter, McPherson explains that he was drawn to become a historian of the Civil War and Reconstruction due to his recognition of the parallels between the 1860s and the 1960s. Accordingly, McPherson’s analyses throughout the text are marked by his observation of the lasting effects of previous American conflicts in relation to the Civil War, as well as his attention to the Civil War’s impact on the civil rights movement and on contemporary American politics. 

McPherson has earned distinction as a foremost historian of the Civil War, and in 2000, he was named Jefferson Lecturer by the National Endowment for the Humanities. Additionally, he has received The Lincoln Forum’s Richard Nelson Current Award of Achievement, the Pritzker Military Library Literature Award, and the Samuel Eliot Morison Prize. He is known for his activism in the preservation of Civil War sites and was appointed in 1991 to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission. He is also one of several reputable historians who petitioned President Obama not to lay a wreath on the Confederate Memorial at Arlington Cemetery in 2009. McPherson makes clear his condemnation of the Confederacy in Chapters 3 and 4, in which he rejects any equivocation on the justness of the Confederacy in war cause and conduct or on the Confederacy’s legacy in the national identity.

Among McPherson’s published titles are The Struggle for Equality: Abolitionists and the Negro in the Civil War and Reconstruction (1964), The Negro’s Civil War: How American Negroes Felt and Acted During the War for the Union (1965), The Abolitionist Legacy: From Reconstruction to the NAACP (1975), Ordeal by Fire: The Civil War and Reconstruction (1982), Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution (1991), Tried by War: Abraham Lincoln as Commander in Chief (2008), and many more. He has also been an editor and contributor for numerous books, including but not limited to Battle Chronicles of the Civil War (1989), Why the Confederacy Lost (1992), The Atlas of the Civil War (1994), and Encyclopedia of Civil War Biographies (2000). His 1988 book Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era won the 1989 Pulitzer Prize for History.

Abraham Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) was a lawyer and politician who served in the House of Representatives and became the 16th President of the United States. Having led the United States through the Civil War, he is remembered for preserving the Union, abolishing enslavement, expanding the power of the federal government, and transforming the American economy. Consequently, he plays the most prominent role in the text, and McPherson’s analysis of Lincoln’s political and military actions provide insight on his convictions and character. 

The most significant aspect of Lincoln’s role in the text is his profound understanding of the legacy of the American Revolution. McPherson’s analysis establishes the fact that Lincoln was guided by the principles of the Declaration of Independence and by his understanding that these ideals were incompatible with the practice of enslavement. Thus, from the outset of Lincoln’s political career, he espoused an antislavery sentiment that evolved to an abolitionist stance, especially when the war necessitated that emancipation become a national strategy and policy aim. Underlying Lincoln’s political and military decisions were religious convictions developed in the face of the war’s mounting death and destruction. 

Moreover, McPherson draws attention to the character traits and leadership qualities that defined Lincoln’s presidency. In Chapter 8, for example, McPherson notes the pragmatism and shrewdness that guided Lincoln’s political decisions, including his use of strategic diversions “to appease conservatives while manipulating them toward acceptance of radical policies” (117). Chapter 9 highlights Lincoln’s tendency toward risk-taking, using this trait to explain why Lincoln expected the same qualities in those that he placed in command.

Jefferson Davis

Jefferson Davis (1808-1889) was a politician and military leader. Before the Civil War, he represented Mississippi in the Senate and House of Representatives and served as secretary of war. He was the first and only president of the Confederacy. McPherson mentions Davis several times, particularly in his direct comparison of Davis and Lincoln at the beginning of Chapter 9. While Lincoln’s only military experience was as captain of a militia unit that did not have to fight during the Black Hawk War, Davis was a West Point graduate who had served in the army for several years, commanded a regiment during the Mexican-American War, and been secretary of war under the Pierce administration. Thus, Davis serves as Lincoln’s foil and underscores the extraordinariness of Lincoln’s success as commander in chief

As an outspoken advocate of enslavement and white supremacy, Davis was influential in the years leading up to the Civil War. McPherson highlights the fact that during Davis’s tenure as a Mississippi Senator, he denounced California’s admission as a free state, fearing that it would tip the balance of power against those states that practiced enslavement, thereby undermining white supremacy. Over the matter of the ceded territories, he challenged an Illinois congressman to a duel. He also represents the irony that both sides of the Civil War believed themselves to be fighting for the legacy of the founding fathers. He is one of the Southerners “who embraced secession with heavy hearts and a conviction that it was the Northern people who betrayed the great promise of 1776” (97). Davis is also mentioned in Chapters 3 and 5.

Ulysses S. Grant

Ulysses S. Grant (1822-1885) was an American military officer who served as the 18th president of the United States. He is one of the “larger-than-life, near-mythical individuals” (2) to which McPherson attributes ongoing and intense interest in the Civil War. McPherson mentions Grant numerous times because of his role as a successful commanding general and Lincoln’s general-in-chief who carried the Union Army to the final defeat of the Confederacy. McPherson utilizes Grant as a comparison to Farragut in Chapter 6 and to McClellan in Chapter 10, thereby highlighting the risk-taking qualities that Lincoln demanded of his military officers.

In the final chapter of the text, McPherson focuses on Grant’s role as president during Reconstruction. The Grant administration was responsible for cracking down on the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) to mediate the violence inflicted on freedmen and Republicans. Therefore, a part of Grant’s legacy is his use of the 14th and 15th Amendments to expand the federal government’s power to protect civil rights. McPherson also refers to Grant at the beginning of Chapter 2 to set the stage for the discussion of the Mexican-American War and its role in deepening sectional conflict.

George B. McClellan

George B. McClellan (1826-1885) was an American politician and military officer who served as Lincoln’s general-in-chief for less than a year. After gaining distinction during the Mexican-American War and the early part of the Civil War, McClellan was invited to Washington to command the Army of the Potomac. McPherson devotes Chapter 10 to a discussion of Lincoln’s growing frustration with McClellan’s refusal to fight, take risks, or hold himself accountable for his failures. As a result, McClellan made enemies of those who once advocated for his appointment to respected ranks. 

Before Chapter 10, McPherson highlights the character traits that rendered McClellan unsuitable for his commanding role in the Civil War. In Chapter 6, McClellan functions as the counterpart of Du Pont in McPherson’s explanation of why Du Pont “faded into obscurity” (81), while Farragut, like Grant, “emerged into greatness” (81). In Chapter 9’s discussion of Lincoln’s role as commander in chief, McClellan is one of the commanders who “did not live up to Lincoln’s expectations” (136) and “seemed to be paralyzed by the responsibility for the lives of their men as well as the fate of their army and nation” (136). Therefore, the attention to McClellan is integral to McPherson’s analysis of what traits distinguished Lincoln as a commander in chief.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text