logo

45 pages 1 hour read

Vivek Murthy

Together: The Healing Power of Human Connection in a Sometimes Lonely World

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1, Chapters 3-5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1, Chapter 3 Summary: “Cultures and Connection”

Chapter 3 explores loneliness and social connection in different cultures. It begins with an anecdote about a DC-area Uber driver originally from Ethiopia who found community away from his family, amid other Ethiopian immigrants. Murthy points out that different cultures value social connection differently and that loneliness occurs when experiences fail to meet expectations. For example, solitude is socially acceptable in Sweden, but less so in Italy and Greece. Thus, socially isolated Italians and Greeks tend to feel lonelier than socially isolated Swedes.

Researchers divide societies into three types: 1) individualistic; 2) collectivist; and 3) transitional. Elderly members of transitional societies, such as Israel and Japan, are at risk for loneliness because they are accustomed to strong social networks. By contrast, in individualistic societies like Norway, the elderly are used to being alone and experience less loneliness. Although Murthy praises social connectedness, he cautions readers not to idealize collective cultures. For example, Hutterite communities have strong social networks, but they also stress conformity and compel nonconformists to leave. Traditional cultures in South Asia, North Africa, and the Middle East similarly stress conformity. In such cultures, nonconformity with regard to skin color, ethnicity, and sexual orientation can foster feuds, group violence, and murder.

Murthy compares cultures to bowls. Bowls come in different sizes and shapes. Their characteristics impact how people experience loneliness and togetherness. In individualistic cultures, the bowl is broad and large enough for people to choose their own paths, whereas the bowl in collectivist cultures is small and deep, providing narrow common ground and forcing people to intermingle. Those who do not conform in collectivist cultures may feel as lonely as those who do not have strong familial bonds and friendships in individualistic cultures. Murthy promotes the idea of a third bowl that brings together the best of the other two. This third bowl provides common ground but also allows for individuality and personal choice. He points to Anaheim, California, where civic authorities promote both uniqueness and a shared culture of kindness. Anaheim addresses social disconnection through Hi Neighbor, a program that organizes dinners and neighborhood safety groups, and through the Million Acts of Kindness program, an elementary school initiative that promotes inclusivity and collectivity. Anaheim also approaches opioid addiction with kindness, emphasizing treatment over punishment.

Traditional gender roles and the persistence of male and female spheres influence how men and women experience loneliness. Men communicate differently than women. Men have few approved avenues for social intimacy, while women are socialized to share their feelings. Men are thus less likely than women to admit they are lonely. This silence erodes men’s health and changes their personalities. As Murthy observes, however, communication patterns are learned. Encouraging boys to share their feelings and develop meaningful friendships—rather than focusing on independence, emotional stoicism, and physical prowess—can improve men’s mental health and reduce male suicide rates. In contrast to men, women are socialized to build connections. Women are often selfless and become voiceless in their relationships. They care for others, diminish themselves, and cover their feelings. They feel shame when their relationships fail and thus outwardly project strength, a tendency that contributes to their loneliness. Encouraging women to be open and honest about their struggles can combat shame and help them feel less alone.

Murthy suggests that too much freedom of individual expression, in the absence of promoting community, has fueled loneliness. Addressing loneliness thus requires investing in quality relationships and strengthening community bonds to give people a sense of value and purpose.

Part 1, Chapter 4 Summary: “Why Now?”

Social engagement began to decline at the end of the 20th century. Technological innovations offered new ways to connect yet left many feeling alone. People now order meals through apps, stream movies in their homes, shop online, and telecommute to work and school. Humans were built to adapt, but many struggle to keep up with the accelerated pace of change in today’s world, creating tensions between tradition and innovation, the old and the young, and physical and virtual communities. Unstable social networks often supersede stable family networks, jeopardizing innate social systems.

Social media is a major contributor to loneliness. Although social media offers opportunities to connect with people around the world, these connections are often superficial. Spending more than two hours per day in front of screens negatively impacts mental health. However, not participating can lead to feelings of isolation. Murthy notes that how people use digital technology is as important as how often they use it. A few minutes of harmful content is more impactful on children than long family experiences online. However, achieving balance has become increasingly challenging as technology has woven its way into all aspects of life. Handheld devices distract people by splitting their attention, which reduces their efficiency and diminishes the quality of their engagement with their tasks.

The easy connections people make through technology, moreover, are no substitute for hard-won traditional friendships. Technology creates distance between people and reduces empathy. People are more likely to be cruel to others online than they are in face-to-face interactions. Social media promotes comparison, which can fuel anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem. Technology also diminishes people’s capacity for solitude, which is necessary for developing a strong sense of self.

Despite these dangers, however, technology can create connections. For example, videoconferencing allows students to learn from experts across the country, while online groups help people with common interests find community. In these examples, technology functions as a way station to connect people in real life, as opposed to being strictly virtual.

Murthy also examines the ways transportation has transformed social connections. Many people move to new countries for work. Others migrate to escape poverty, violence, and the effects of climate change. For many immigrants, the absence of family and friends, lack of social networks, language barriers, cultural differences, discrimination, and the loss of identity, status, and career contribute to loneliness. Health problems often follow. In extreme cases, people die by suicide. Organizations have sought to help new immigrants by keeping people connected through mentoring and volunteer opportunities, both of which reduce loneliness. Entire industries have arisen to address loneliness, including robotic pets and companions, online games played with virtual friends, and karaoke booths for one.

People are living longer than ever. With advanced age comes health problems and other losses. Seniors often outlive their partners, families, and friends. Many have disabilities and feel isolated. The problem is particularly acute in modernizing countries, such as Korea and China, where young people move away from home, leaving behind elders who expected reverence and care. Suicide sometimes follows. Although elderly people in the West are more accustomed to being alone, they are often too embarrassed to ask for help. In the US, social services are starting to address the needs of aging baby boomers. Senior-centered organizations, such as the Village Movement, help seniors get the help they need while maintaining their independence. This includes providing rides to doctors’ appointments, grocery shopping, and housekeeping.

Strong social bonds not only decrease loneliness but can also address pressing social concerns, such as poverty, racial inequities, climate change, and terrorism. Addressing these problems requires dialogue and cooperation. Disconnection exacerbates division and distrust. In the US, this has impacted political discourse. Murthy promotes the idea of a global family and mutual belonging, as isolation makes people feel invisible. Reaching out rehumanizes them and fosters a sense of belonging. People must occupy the same space, share responsibility for it, and reap its rewards. Resolving conflicts requires listening, speaking from the heart, and commitment. The absence of connection that comes with loneliness makes people less likely to participate in civic affairs, which fuels societal divisions. 

Part 1, Chapter 5 Summary: “Unmasking Loneliness”

Chapter 5 describes different manifestations of loneliness. Murthy explains that loneliness has many faces. It can appear as alienation, sadness, anger, and other negative emotional states. Fearing rejection and abandonment, lonely people often end up alienating those closest to them with antisocial behavior, such as withdrawal, indifference, and anger.

Studies link loneliness and violence. While many factors can spark violent behavior, violent criminals often experience alienation in their households. Searching for a place to belong, many youths turn to gangs, who serve as substitutes for family. Their loneliness often expresses itself as hostility. Violence momentarily covers the loneliness, but the feelings of alienation eventually return, fueling more violence or other coping mechanisms, such as substance use.

Addressing loneliness, Murthy argues, is central to stopping this cycle. This might include setting time aside to help others, which can heal the trauma of loneliness by making people feel connected. Studies show that the type of service does not matter if it provides a sense of purpose and meaning. Service shifts the brain’s response away from danger and flight to seeking, discovering, and wanting. The latter system overrides the former, transferring focus away from the self and promoting relief. This relief eases encounters with others, creating bonds between people working toward common goals.

Research shows that loneliness drives addiction to alcohol, drugs, food, and sex. Almost all people with alcoholism experience loneliness, making social connection a key tool in addressing addiction. Forming bonds with others who have experienced addiction is central to maintaining sobriety. Thus, programs like Alcoholics Anonymous focus on sponsorship, where alcoholics serve as mentors to help each other stay sober. Murthy describes this type of service as a two-way gift: Sponsors share their struggles and triumphs, strengthening recipients who need hope and guidance, as well as themselves by fostering a sense of purpose.

Loneliness is often rooted in childhood trauma, including poverty, domestic violence, neglect, and parental divorce. These early wounds impact learning and behavior in the long-term. Although trauma increases the risk of experiencing addiction and loneliness, these outcomes are not foregone conclusions. Relationships can help heal trauma. Even one caring adult can make the difference in the life of a lonely child.

Part 1, Chapters 3-5 Analysis

As in previous chapters, Murthy relies on anecdotes to engage readers and segue to his larger claims and arguments. For example, he begins Chapter 3 with an anecdote about an Uber driver, an Ethiopian immigrant whose wife and children were still in Addis Ababa. The anecdote serves as a point of departure for Murthy’s discussion of the cultural specificity of loneliness. Murthy argues that loneliness occurs when social experiences and social expectations misalign. Ethiopian culture stresses community: Working parents often leave their children in the care of family members and neighbors. The Ethiopian driver didn’t feel lonely, therefore, because he formed a community with other Ethiopian immigrants and because his wife and children were in the care of an extended social network. Murthy follows this anecdote a personal anecdote about traditional Indian culture, which similarly stresses community:

My parents described equally close-knit community networks when they told me about growing up in India. And when I used to stay at my great-grandmother’s house in Bangalore as a child, spontaneous drop-in visits from friends and extended family were daily occurrences. Most of the visitors lived nearby and, whether or not we were related to them, my sister and I were encouraged to call everyone ‘uncle’ and ‘aunty’. This made it seem as if we were all part of one enormous family (63-64).

This anecdote contrasts with the childhood loneliness Murthy describes in Chapter 2 after moving to a new neighborhood and further highlights the role of alignment between social expectations—what one is used to—and their actual social experiences.

Murthy argues that major societal changes contribute to the loneliness problem by creating further gaps between social expectations and experiences. For instance, he ascribes the increase in loneliness in part to accelerating migration, citing a report by the UN International Organization for Migration to highlight the scope of migration and displacement globally:

3.5 percent of the world’s total population, or 272 million people, lived outside their home countries in 2019 […] Another sixty-six million adults in 2015 planned to move permanently to another country within the next year for reasons that included religious and ethnic persecution, war, violence, and human rights violations. Climate change, too: eighteen million people in 135 countries were displaced in 2017 by weather-related disasters (123).

To illustrate the impacts of social change on loneliness, he focuses on the connection between loneliness and suicide. He points to transitional societies like South Korea, where the young move away to pursue careers, leaving behind elders who expected loyalty and care: “In South Korea, rates of suicide among the elderly more than quintupled from 1990 to 2009, and as of 2017, they remained the highest among industrialized nations” (124). In Chapter 4, he discusses his uncle Rajesh, who left his wife and children in India and pursue a career as an engineer in Miami, Florida. Rajesh struggled to integrate into American culture and spent most of his time alone; he died by suicide after losing his job. Murthy segues from Rajesh’s story to a report by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, which reveals that 54% of those who die by suicide have no diagnosis of mental illness and that nearly 800,000 people around the world died by suicide in 2016. Although suicide rates are decreasing globally, they are increasing in some countries, including the US: “The United States […] experienced a one-third increase in suicide mortality rates between 1999–2017 with rates being particularly high in rural areas, among men, and in certain refugee communities” (120). Murthy thus emphasizes that social connection—particularly among those from community-focused cultures—can prevent loneliness and thus save lives by lowering suicide rates, connecting loneliness to wider public health concerns.

Murthy also argues that strong social bonds mitigate the negative effects of various forms of childhood trauma, including domestic abuse and neglect. A study of childhood resilience in Kauai, Hawaii, for example, revealed that children who experienced poverty, abuse, or family discord but who also had strong social connections not only grew up to be “competent, confident, and caring” (163), but also “managed to marry and establish careers, and [become] devoted parents themselves” (163). In this way, Murthy directly connects social connection to resilience.

Chapter 5 echoes Murthy’s assertion in the Preface that loneliness is a “dark thread” woven through multiple public health concerns as he discusses different manifestations of loneliness and their societal impact. Murthy again grounds his arguments in research. In addressing the timeliness of his book, for instance, he cites a 2010 study from the University of Michigan, which found a nearly 40% drop in empathy scores among college students between 1979 and 2009, with the biggest drop dating to the 2000s. He argues that loneliness can manifest as alienation, sadness, and other emotions associated with antisocial behavior, such as withdrawal, indifference, and anger, citing an illustrative study: “when researchers planted the idea in subjects’ minds that they’d be alone in later life or that their fellow subjects had rejected them, [they] tended to react by lashing out or by deriding those they believed had rejected them” (147). Researchers have also found evidence of loneliness in the backgrounds of violent criminals, from mass shooters to serial killers. Loneliness also manifests differently in men and women. Men are socialized to internalize emotions, which fuels their loneliness. By contrast, women are socialized to connect, which leaves them feeling lonely when their relationships fail. Lonely people often turn to alcohol and other substances to numb their pain. The only way to address these social problems, Murthy argues, is to deal with the root cause: loneliness.

Murthy argues for Social Connections as an Antidote to Loneliness. He presents Anaheim as a model for fostering such connection. Civic leaders in Anaheim nurture individual uniqueness and promote a shared culture of kindness through programs that not only strengthen the city’s social fabric, but also set an example for other communities experiencing social concerns associated with loneliness and alienation. Murthy also identifies service as an important tool against loneliness. Service gives people a sense of purpose and meaning, both of which play a key role in social connectedness. Service also heals the trauma of loneliness: Researchers have found that the hypervigilance associated with loneliness is egocentric and leaves little room for empathy or concern for others. Studies by neuroscientists show that service shifts the brain’s response away from danger and the self. It creates “a sort of therapeutic state” and creates a sense of relief (156), which in turn eases encounters with others and promotes cooperation. As Murthy notes, however, caring about an issue is not enough, nor is simply joining a group: “The real therapeutic synergy occurs when we come together with others to take action to achieve a common goal” (156). Although online groups can help people connect, they are no replacement for the meaningful bonds people make during face-to-face interactions.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text