logo

61 pages 2 hours read

Whittaker Chambers

Witness: Cold War Classics

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 1952

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Foreword-Chapter 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Foreword Summary

Whittaker Chambers’s foreword takes the form of a letter to his children. He warns them that Witness reveals the ugly realities of the titanic global struggle between Communism and freedom, of which his legal showdown with Alger Hiss is merely one example.

The Cold War has placed the conflict between Communism and freedom at the center of world politics. There is a serious danger that liberal societies will succumb to the allure of political Marxism. Very few people break entirely with Communist ideology once they have embraced it. They might break with the Communist Party, out of base disillusionment or frustration with its internal politicking. But even then, they often hold on to its fundamental tenet: that human reason alone is sufficient to remake the world.

Those who break from Communism entirely, as Chambers has done, have a crisis of conscience. They tend to realize that human reason is not, by itself, a powerful enough force to create a good society. All ex-Communists want to be free. Chambers insists that true freedom requires a belief in God and in the immortality of the human soul. The conflict between Communism and freedom is thus a religious one: It must end with one faith vanquishing the other.

Against this historical backdrop, Chambers functions as a witness in three ways. First, in the legal sense, he supplied eyewitness testimony against Hiss. Second, in the moral sense, his decision to testify against Hiss arose from his desire to live in exact alignment with his convictions. By extension, this act has allowed him to offer a public witness for his religious faith and demonstrate the value of his ethical beliefs. Third, Chambers was a witness to the true nature of Communism, having been a part of the political movement for years. He admits that its demand that followers exercise total discipline in their adherence to Marxist ideology—and be willing to sacrifice everything in service to it—is personally attractive. More broadly, Chambers argues that Communism’s appeal stems from its promise that heaven on earth can be achieved solely through human effort. The power of Chambers’s triplicate witness is that it fuses three separate yet interrelated experiences of the Cold War into a single personal narrative.

Having set up the existential stakes of this conflict, Chambers turns his attention to sketching the personal consequences of his involvement with it. He and his family now live on a Maryland farm, where he hopes to protect his children from any dangers that might result because of his defection from the Party. He also intends for the farm’s natural beauty to teach his children the wonder of God’s creation, along with the reality of sin and suffering.

Chambers recalls that he took his children for a nighttime walk after he told them of his Communist past. Overcome with the stress of the Hiss trial, Chambers wandered off by himself and began to contemplate suicide. Then his son called out for him and begged him never to go away.

Chambers closes the Foreword by creating an analogy between the unfolding of his book’s narrative and the path to Golgotha, the hill atop of which Jesus Christ was crucified. His children must learn that life is painful, and that their father will not always be there for them. This realization will make them wise.

Chapter 1 Summary: “Flight”

Chapter 1, “Flight,” begins in 1937 with Chambers’s agonizing decision to abandon Communism and the Communist Party. He reveals the names and organizations that make up the Soviet apparatus in the United States, which he served with dedication for years. Many of the Americans who served beside him are socially prominent and include, but are not limited to, the infamous Alger Hiss.

The year 1937 is one of extreme danger for Communists. Stalin is purging anyone he perceives as disloyal—both inside and outside the Soviet Union—and his worldwide network of assets makes assassinations simple. The slightest hint of disloyalty is subject to brutal punishment, as is defection.

Chambers thus expects that his decision to leave the Party will subject him to the full wrath of the Soviets’ underground network in the US. In the hopes of evading punishment, he plans his break with Communism carefully, securing a new car, hiding place, and weapon in case anyone hunts him down. He also secures a meeting with fellow agent Maxim Lieber, a.k.a. “Paul,” who is sympathetic to Chambers and tells him about the Party’s efforts to find him. In a menacing twist, Paul reveals that Chambers’s Soviet handler has disappeared.

Soviet agents make contact with Chambers’s brother-in-law through a woman who was both a friend to Chambers and his wife as well as a darling of the Boston elite. His brother-in-law is pressured to turn Chambers over to the Party, and suggests that failure to do so will result in Chambers’s vigilante execution.

Chambers’s employer likewise tells him that Soviet allies are looking for him. While Chambers’s manager is also Communist, he nonetheless admires Chambers’s courageous choice to defect. The manager states that while he was an agent in Nazi Germany, other Communists had tricked him into believing that his contacts had suffered a gruesome death. Only later did he learn that the Communists themselves had staged every murder. Chambers finds the whole story odd and wonders about his employer’s motives in telling him this. His discomfort with these episodes plants the seed of his offense against the Party and its underground network.

Chambers heads south with his family, settling near Daytona Beach in Florida. He continues his work as a translator—he had translated the novel Bambi years earlier—but decides that he cannot stay in hiding indefinitely. So long as he is underground, he is a nonentity: His apprehension or death at the hands of Soviet agents will go unnoticed. In contrast, establishing a public-facing life might afford him a measure of protection. If he is murdered, and the crime is traced back to the Soviets, it will be counted as an international incident between the US and the USSR. The Chambers family hence moves to Baltimore, where they live semi-openly and often rely on the kindness of strangers.

Chambers begins a quiet battle against the Communist Party, which he knew would never voluntarily give him peace. His first step is to confront his old comrades, starting with US Treasury Department official Harry Dexter White. Chambers threatens to publicly denunciate them if they do not defect from the Party. Chambers next goes to the home of Alger Hiss and his wife, Priscilla. Chambers urges both of the Hisses to defect, citing the many crimes of Stalin’s regime. Priscilla dismisses these contemptuously. Yet as Chambers prepares to leave what then seems like their final meeting, his old friend Hiss sheds a few tears. This reaction, of course, is in stark contrast to Hiss’s later denial that he ever knew Chambers.

Chambers is able to enjoy a real Christmas with his family. The pleasure he experiences during this sacred season hastens his return to the Christian faith.

Chambers discusses Stalin’s cruelty and tyranny. However, he notes that knowledge alone, even of such great crimes, is insufficient to break the will of most Communists. Indeed, it is the nagging of his conscience, not the revelation of new facts, that leads him back to religious faith and prayer. As he embraces belief in God and the eternal existence of the human soul, he encounters a way of thinking and living utterly opposed to Communism.

With his family short on money, Chambers accepts a position as an editor of Time magazine. He will stay there for nearly a decade. The relative comfort and stability of this position allow him to contemplate the tumult of his previous life.

Chapter 2 Summary: “The Story of a Middle Class Family”

Chapter 2, “The Story of a Middle-Class Family,” returns to Chambers’s childhood, beginning with his birth in Philadelphia on April 1, 1901. He despises his birth name, Jay Vivien, which he eventually exchanges for “Whittaker” (his mother’s maiden name) instead.

The Chambers family moves to Long Island while he is still a young child. His first memories are of forming a deep connection with the natural world and experiencing a profound love for his younger brother, Richard. His father, Jay, finds success with Decorative Designers, a well-respected group of commercial illustrators. Despite his father’s accomplishments, the family enjoys few middle-class conveniences. Jay fancies himself a “real artist,” which to him means that he and his family should live without any bourgeois comforts. Chambers describes the family home as “arty” but having little actual art (107). It is characterized by cheap reproductions of artistic beauty rather than the real thing.

The family home is also afflicted by emotional turmoil. With an ego fueled by memories of youthful success as an actress, Chambers’s mother, Laha, resents her husband as an intellectual inferior and treats him with contempt. She is nevertheless enormously dedicated to their two boys, whom she raises with a strict code of gentlemanly conduct. Chambers notes that he continues to conform to this etiquette even as an adult.

As a child, Chambers recoils from the cruelties and violence of the schoolyard. Despite participating in various sports, he forms few friendships.

His parents have little use for religion, but Chambers’s love for the natural world later informs his conception of the divine.

As Chambers grows up, his father begins coming home less and less frequently. Eventually, his mother informs him and his brother that their father will not be coming home ever again. Chambers surmises that his father’s hesitancy to receive affection is the root cause of his parents’ marital discord.

In his father’s absence, the family barely scrapes by economically. Chambers also discovers that he has inherited his mother’s acute fear of home invaders. Despite poverty and anxiety, though, the three of them live a happy life. His mother pours affection on her sons, often proposing grand dreams like buying an island or a farm to help the boys imagine a better future. He learns about Quakerism from his paternal grandmother and enjoys the earnest affection of his paternal grandfather, a large and cheerful man whom Chambers compares to Shakespeare’s Falstaff. His grandfather provides Chambers’s first introduction to the world of politics. In addition, he allows Chambers to read his copy of Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables. The story’s emphasis on small beauties in a world rife with evil and suffering makes a significant impact on Chambers.

Chambers’s father eventually returns home. Yet even after coming home, Jay chooses to live a solitary and mean existence. In an act of pointless cruelty, he  cuts down Laha’s flowers. Chambers escapes this turmoil by going on walks in the woods and feels happiness while studying languages.

After high school, his mother wants him to go to college. However, he first works on a railroad in Washington, DC. This association with workers from many different countries and backgrounds, all of whom are all victims of capitalist exploitation, lays the foundation for his future embrace of Communism. His closest friend on the job touches a third rail and is severely incapacitated.

Chambers moves to New Orleans, which deepens his sympathy for the plight of the poor. To his embarrassment, he runs out of money and has to ask for his father to pay his way back home.

Chambers starts college at Williams but quickly balks at its setting and expense. He relocates back to New York City so that he can live at home while attending Columbia, where he develops a love of poetry. He nearly joins a Quaker mission to provide relief in war-torn Russia, but the Quakers reject him upon learning that he is an atheist.

Chambers drops out of Columbia to join the Party. Shortly thereafter, his family takes in his paternal grandmother, who is suffering from dementia. The violent rages between her and Chambers’s father put added stress on an already difficult home situation. Chambers is glad to see Richard leave it behind to attend Colgate College.

While he and Richard were not especially close as children, Richard begins reaching out to him. Chambers learns that Richard has left his studies at Colgate. Chambers unsuccessfully urges him to return to school. During Christmas vacation, Richard appears in ill health and rants about the emptiness of virtue and the meaninglessness of existence. Chambers offers Communism as an answer to Richard’s existential struggles, but Richard immediately dismisses it.

Richard decides to remain at home indefinitely. Tragically, his psychological spiral continues unabated. He tries to convince Chambers to enter a mutual-suicide pact. When Chambers refuses, Richard calls his brother a coward. Meanwhile, the family realizes that Richard has developed a severe drinking problem. Their mother insists that Chambers intervene to curb Richard’s alcohol consumption. Chambers’s attempts to keep Richard from drinking are not only unsuccessful but also make him the target of Richard’s drunken rages.

Despite Chambers’s best efforts to keep to himself, he regularly finds his brother trying to end his own life and witnesses his father beating Richard. In an attempt to safeguard Richard’s well-being, Chambers begins watching him overnight.

Richard marries, but within months his wife returns to her parents, and he finds his own apartment. One night, he fails to meet Chambers at the local train station. The next morning, his mother receives a call informing them that Richard has killed himself in his apartment. His brother’s death imbues Chambers with a desire to learn how the world could plunge a man as gentle and kind as Richard into absolute despair, especially at such a young age.

Richard’s death softens Chambers’s relationship with Jay, who dies soon thereafter. After visiting his brother’s grave on New Year’s Eve, Chambers writes a poem. Overcome with pain, he vows never to visit the grave again.

Chapter 3 Summary: “The Outrage and the Hope of the World”

In Chapter 3, “The Outrage and the Hope of the World,” Chambers further unpacks his reasons for becoming a Communist. In general, he explains, Communism draws people—especially intellectuals—who are seeking answers to the problems of war and economic crisis. Communism offers them clear solutions, and these are especially satisfying for those who feel personally compelled to save the world from disaster.

Chambers argues that few Communists are seeking personal gain, because the risks of joining the Party far outweigh the benefits. This is especially true for anyone who has a social reputation to uphold.

He further notes that few people join the Party as a result of reading Marx and Lenin. Rather, Chambers says, they turn to Communist texts after having first become distressed over an acute social crisis. It is the apparent decay of existing institutions and belief systems that leads people desperate for solutions to search out radical alternatives.

Chambers himself is troubled by the problem of war. Visiting Germany with a friend in 1923, he saw the lingering impact of the First World War, as well as the looming inevitability of another.

Chambers points out that he first turned to socialism before concluding that its solutions were too modest to address the true scope of the problem. Reading a short pamphlet by Lenin on life in a Soviet workers’ collective offered Chambers the practical vision he was seeking. Despite its discomfort relative to Western life, the practicality of the Communist vision is irresistible to Chambers. He is thrilled by the idea of serving a higher cause and embracing hard discipline. Through an associate at Columbia, who talked often of Communism, Chambers connects with his local chapter of the Communist Party.

Foreword-Chapter 3 Analysis

The publication of Witness should have been a triumphant moment for Chambers, for several reasons. Hiss had just been found guilty (albeit only of perjury) after a long and grueling series of trials. Regardless, Chambers’s crusade against Hiss had won him many admirers in government and journalistic spheres. One of Chambers’s most notable supporters, a congressman named Richard Nixon (R-CA), become Dwight D. Eisenhower’s vice-presidential running mate during the 1952 presidential campaign. Chambers had achieved the safety and prosperity he claimed to crave. He was free to write and work on his beloved Maryland farm, with his family and faith to strengthen him.

It would thus have been easy for Chambers to frame Witness’s narrative as a classic hero’s journey: A young man born to misfortune endures many trials before vanquishing his adversaries and turning to a life of virtuous simplicity. Similarly, Chambers could have used Witness as a rallying cry for young people to avoid the mistakes that he had made, using his story to inspire hope that the threat of Communism would be withstood and even overcome.

Instead, Chambers begins Witness on a note of profound gloom. His somber foreword is all the more remarkable in that he explicitly directs his message of hopelessness towards his children. Chambers appears to have written the bulk of his book before penning this dedicatory letter, at which point he surely knew that he was writing for a large audience—not just providing a final testament for his family. Consequently, Chambers’s foreword fuses his private and public messaging into a single narrative of impending doom.

Chambers’s pessimism stems from his belief that Communism offers a much more appealing message than democratic liberalism. Unlike liberal political theory, Communism gets right to the heart of human nature’s desire for control and its urge to prevent suffering. People tend to believe that, with enough power, they can make the world a better place. Communism feeds that urge, but it does so at the cost of destroying the social norms and political regulations that restrain such power from dangerously overstepping its boundaries.

As interpreted by figures like Stalin, Communism became a formula for “the ends justify the means” moral reasoning. In other words, it provided adherents with permission to do terrible things in the name of advancing the ultimate happiness of humanity. Chambers insists that this ethical permissiveness is far more tempting than democratic moderation, much less Christian humility.

Chambers likewise highlights the practicality of Communism and rues its ability to connect individual action with a meaningful grand vision of change. Communism might be anathema to certain other aspects of human nature—namely, the soul and conscience—but he asserts that a culture of reason and logic readily overrides such abstract concerns.

Chambers’s faith in God clearly does not translate into faith in humanity. After creating a binary division of Cold War belligerents into “servants of God” and “servants of mankind,” Chambers predicts that the world is likely to succumb to Communism. Even so, he feels that all hope cannot be lost so long as a flicker of the soul remains.

Despite being the paradigmatic embodiment of the phrase “cold comfort,” Witness was an instant bestseller. Yet even at the pinnacle of his success, Chambers regarded his biography as a story that would soon be forbidden, rejected by the public to which it appealed and almost assuredly outlawed by a new Communist regime. This would leave Chambers’s children, doomed to a grim future, as its only audience. In this sense, the Foreword to Witness begins his story at its point of completion.

The portrait that Chambers paints of the Communist network in the United States in Chapter 1 would seem to confirm all the dire warnings in the Foreword. The number of prominent people serving this hostile ideology gave powerful proof of its appeal. If Communism had won over its best and brightest, Western democracy would soon be forced to rely on second-tier minds to defend itself. The threat Chambers feels as a result of Stalin’s purges, and his terror that the global Stalinist assassination network will destroy him or his loved ones, are omnipresent throughout the text.

At the same time, Chambers betrays his own pessimism. The ultimate success of his complex escape suggests that he was better at cloak-and-dagger intrigue than he let on in his memoir. The fact that he could escape from the Party at all undermines its supposed invincibility. Chambers and his family evade both capture and death, even as he revisits his Communist contacts and they travel to unfamiliar places. Without exception, the contacts with whom he meets help Chambers escape: None act like Bolshevik automatons, bent on triggering revolution with no thought for the consequences. Even at its most menacing, the Party reveals its limits whenever it reveals itself. The Communist who issues the most frightening threat is a Boston socialist who almost assuredly is not going to give up her many social perks for the sake of conspiring to murder Chambers. The Party is simultaneously fearsome and pathetic, especially as the punitive machinery of the purges turns against the Party itself.

The next chapter pushes the story still further back to Chambers’s childhood. Its bland title, “The Story of a Middle-Class Family,” puts a tense smile on his unstable and at times traumatic youth. Like the Party itself, Chambers conceals as much as he reveals. Among other things, he avoids mentioning that the real reason his father left the family was to pursue romantic relationships with other men.

Chambers also fails to mention that he too enjoyed sexual liaisons with men throughout the 1930s. Rumors of Chambers’s love for other men later fueled speculation that Chambers was trying to destroy Hiss’s reputation because Hiss had romantically rejected him. Hiss himself had a personal interest in pushing this narrative: After dropping the defense that he had never met Chambers, Hiss and his lawyers claimed that he had no choice but to decline Chambers’s sexual advances because he (Hiss) was exclusively attracted to women. Chambers dismissed the notion that his decision to inform on Hiss was an act of romantic revenge. Even so, Chambers did admit privately to the FBI that he had a sexual interest in other men, which he believed he had inherited from his father.

That Chambers chose to leave out the life-altering significance of sexual and romantic connections between men—both in his father’s life and in his own—shows that he had an acute awareness of his era’s widespread intolerance towards gay people. Witness was published during the Lavender Scare, a period during which the US government hunted down and fired civil servants suspected of having sexual relationships with members of the same sex. This bigoted campaign was fueled by the widespread yet baseless belief that Communists could more easily recruit this demographic of individuals and seduce them into cooperating with pro-Soviet counter-intelligence schemes. Moreover, the highly public conflict between Hiss and Chambers played a major part in establishing “a link between Communism, disloyalty, and homosexuality in the minds of influential Washingtonians, broadening the incipient ‘Red Scare’ into a lavender one” (Kirchik, James. Secret City: The Hidden History of Gay Washington. Henry Holt, 2022). By excluding mention of intimate encounters between men, Chambers was clearly working to protect his narrative’s credibility and ensure that it reached as many readers as possible. In doing so, Chambers again betrays his pessimism: Had he been utterly convinced that his story would soon be forgotten by all but his own children, he might not have worked so hard to make it palatable to the masses.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text