logo

61 pages 2 hours read

Whittaker Chambers

Witness: Cold War Classics

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 1952

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Two Faces of Communism

Throughout Witness, Whittaker Chambers describes Communism as a two-sided paradox. The first is as a ruthless and highly disciplined organization, taking its orders from the Kremlin in Moscow, pursuing the goal of world revolution with absolute dedication. Its agents are everywhere; they have penetrated the highest circles of government and media. They can therefore dispatch enemies or traitors with ease and little fear of consequences. From the time that he breaks with the Party to the end of the Hiss trials, Chambers fears that unseen forces will, at the very least, squelch his testimony, if not lead to lethal retaliation against himself and his family. Chambers’s fears are not entirely baseless. There really were Communists or Communist sympathizers in positions of power, Stalin really did have an extensive network of agents around the globe capable of doing his bidding, and people really did turn up dead (as was famously true in the 1940 murder of Leon Trotsky in Mexico). Chambers argues that Communists’ capacity for violence stems directly from their ideology, which promises a utopian future to those willing to work for it—no matter the cost. Those who resisted such a future, or the efforts of its agents to bring it about, could be considered enemies of human happiness; therefore, it was morally acceptable for Communists to eliminate them.

The other side of Communism is not so much terrifying as absurdly incompetent. Chambers describes many of the Communists he associates with as pathetic, bumbling, and broken. His colleagues at the Daily Worker write turgid articles that no one wants to read, so they buy copies of their own paper to inflate its sales numbers. Chambers’s handler, Colonel Boris Bykov, is a temperamental fool who lets Chambers slip away. Even Hiss, Witness’s ultimate villainous antagonist, fails in his effort to build an espionage ring; for all Hiss’s charms and powerful friends, he also allows HUAC to get the better of him and ends up jailed for perjury. In other words, the same people who are supposedly so driven to change the world at any cost can barely manage their own affairs. Their single-minded focus on revolution has blinded them to the rest of reality. 

Faith and Reason

In the opening pages of Witness, Chambers describes the global struggle between Communism and freedom both as a battle between faith and reason and a battle between two faiths. On one hand, the rise of Communism marks a climactic moment in the historical debate over whether humanity should rely on its faculties of reason or trust in divine power. Communism not only rejects God but also insists on the abolition of religion as a necessary precondition of human liberation. Rather than wait for a paradisical afterlife to experience happiness, Communism promises to create heaven on earth through the power of technology and bureaucratic administration.

Chambers repeatedly stresses that Communism appeals to people because it is practical and lays out its proposed steps in a logical sequence. At the same time, he contends that reason alone cannot inspire people to turn against their own government and community, to risk liberty and life for a glorious future they are unlikely to enjoy themselves. Reason, after all, also demands self-preservation. Communism therefore makes a faith out of reason, with Marx and Lenin serving as saints and the Party as a kind of church. In turn, the Party compels its members to make the same kinds of sacrifices that people have traditionally made only for their gods. Chambers regards Communism as a fearsome union between the wisdom of the world and belief in the hereafter, and he doubts that what he calls “Christian civilization” has the resources to withstand it. In order to be truly free, a person must willingly submit to a moral law outside of themselves to nourish their souls, even at the expense of fulfilling their personal desires. The Communist message that one can do anything that advances the interests of the Communist cause is, by comparison, far more tempting.

In his confrontation with Alger Hiss, Chambers sees the forces of human reason arrayed against him. For Chambers, the powers of the world are making the perfectly reasonable assumption that an awkward turncoat like himself could never triumph over a well-heeled member of the establishment like Hiss. Chambers had every reason to expect that the Justice Department would indict him, or that he would be killed by Soviet agents. Yet his faith moves him forward and ultimately rewards him in the most unexpected ways. Hiss—the friend of presidents and senators, the darling of the press—suffers an ignominious downfall because of Chambers’s testimony and the records he provides. Chambers interprets this reversal in fortunes as the work of spiritual forces that confound human reason and help to manifest God’s divine plan.

Bearing Witness

Chambers frequently pauses his narrative to contemplate the meaning of the book’s title. Chambers becomes famous as a literal witness against Alger Hiss, testifying to his former friend’s record as a Communist and Soviet agent.

Chambers’s fame leads to his embrace by the American conservative movement, which perceives him as a witness against Communism writ large. The details of his life with the Party, especially its underground apparatus, provide a frightening glimpse of a movement that is dedicated to the overthrow of the United States government. Chambers is complicit with, and perhaps even encouraging of, the conservative movement’s lionization of him: He says repeatedly that he does not want to be remembered only as a witness against a person but rather as a witness for the sacred truths of freedom and religion. In this sense, he is a witness for the Christian faith: He wants his actions and words to provide an example of Christian living for others. He contends that serving as a witness against Hiss aligns with his desire to be a witness for Christ.

Chambers regards his testimony against Hiss as serving several purposes. By coming clean about his own unsavory past, he aims to exhibit the need to be true to one’s self. He writes, “I must do this because only by first exposing the evil in himself could a man free himself to expose the evil that beset and secretly threatened other men” (762). He likewise states that his testimony is an example of following the Gospel’s call to “remove the beam from your eye, and you will see clearly then to remove the speck from your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7:5). Expecting to suffer gravely from his accusations against Hiss, Chambers also wanted to provide a model of a man willing to risk everything, even his life, rather than hide the truth. Although it placed his family at great risk, he wanted them to know that beyond their idyllic life on the farm, the world was filled with evil and that they could not hide from it, but would eventually have to confront it. Even after being vindicated, Chambers saw himself as utterly depleted by the effort, that to be a witness is to bear a terrible burden of one’s own sin and the sins of others, and that there was no guarantee that the world would heed the lessons of his actions.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text